A quick question What s the difference between `flytectl san

Question

A quick question What s the difference between `flytectl sandbox` and `flytectl demo` The documentation looks very similar

honnix · Answer

`flytectl demo` seems to be much faster so maybe it is using the single binary thing

Samhita Alla · Answer

Yes We re phasing out `flytectl sandbox` in favor of `flytectl demo`

Dan Rammer (hamersaw) · Answer

< honnix> you are correct `flytectl demo` uses single binary internally

honnix · Answer

Nice Thank for clarification Maybe we can add a quick note on the sandbox part of doc to indicate it is going away

honnix · Answer

Another question Is it possible to expose admin API port Right now it doesn t seem so <https github com flyteorg flytectl blob 1b2221ff7293d0a45ff013908c022623226feefb pkg docker docker util go L135 L143>

honnix · Answer

Well I guess it must be exposed already otherwise how could console communicate I can take a look at the web traffic to figure out

honnix · Answer

Hmm that is the HTTP endpoint though Do we expose gRPC admin endpoints Here is the context for these questions we are exploring whether it is doable to use `flytectl demo` for integration test and the integration point is a couple of RPC endpoints

honnix · Answer

Now I see 30080 proxies gRPC traffic as well

Samhita Alla · Answer

cc < Eduardo Apolinario eapolinario >

Dan Rammer (hamersaw) · Answer

< honnix> gRPC runs over HTTP right Sounds like you have this figured out Also we have explored setting up some integration testing along the same lines Might be interested in discussing this a little deeper

honnix · Answer

Yeah I figure it out I thought it was only protobuf over plan http It s all good now In one of our projects we use sandbox image directly to do integration test <https github com flyteorg flytekit java blob 18a7659993be19cc1f95a3f2289d7e89960e0d2d integration tests src test java org flyte utils FlyteSandboxContainer java> That might be useful for you to take a look