#3253 [Housekeeping] Any plans to more actively maintain bazelrules_flyte? Issue created by samjeckert Describe the issue Hi all! We are very excited about Flyte as a potential replacement to an inhouse tool we've developed, but as we are a monorepo/bazel shop we are a bit daunted with getting the tool integrated. The bazelrules_flyte repo highlights a lot of the things we might want to do ourselves, but given its state its unlikely we can use it directly. What if we do not do this? We likely end up in a less than ideal state with Flyte until if/when we can dedicate the time to deep dive and develop our own rules_flyte equivalent. Related component(s) No response Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already? ☑︎ Yes Have you read the Code of Conduct? ☑︎ Yes flyteorg/flyte