hey @Eduardo Apolinario (eapolinario) @Yee @Sugato Ray I noticed that all our OSS conda-forge versions are out of date: • https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/flytekit • https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/unionml • https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/flyteidl We should discuss how we want to manage this… I believe all we need is someone from the internal team to have access to the corresponding feedstocks so we can merge the auto-PRs that are made when we update these packages on pypi.

good catch. So we should add the 3 of us as maintainers to each of the 3 feedstock repos (https://github.com/conda-forge/flytekit-feedstock, etc), right? Is there any way we can automate these feedstock PRs once we have a release of any of the libraries? I don't have experience with maintaining conda packages.

yep! @Sugato Ray do you own those feedstack repos?

Cc @Bernhard Stadlbauer

Hi @Niels Bantilan Yes. I am a/one-of-the maintainer(s) of these repositories. Please feel free to send a PR to the feedstocks and I will take a look. This will be a good opportunity for us to do some knowledge transfer as well. We will need more people from the community to maintain all the feedstocks on conda-forge (including the plug-ins). cc: @Eduardo Apolinario (eapolinario) @Ketan (kumare3)

@Sugato Ray @Eduardo Apolinario (eapolinario) can we re-consider how we’re maintaining

flytekitplugins-*

in conda forge? I’m not so confident that our current approach is maintainable… basically any time we release a new version of flytekit and flytekitplugins we’ll have to manually approve all

x

plugins in

x

different repos… I forget the tradeoff of having one recipe file for all the plugins, but that would be a lot easier to manage, e.g. in pandera it’s a single recipe: https://github.com/conda-forge/pandera-feedstock/blob/main/recipe/meta.yaml

@Niels Bantilan Has there been any progress on this? If not, do you mind if I start updating

flyteidl

?

hi @Bernhard Stadlbauer not yet, still need to fix CI issues here https://github.com/conda-forge/flytekit-feedstock/pull/25

Exactly! Would you prefer if I do all old versions as well or do you think latest is good enough?

I think the latest is good enough!

Nice thanks! Let’s see how long that takes, PR is here

@Sugato Ray would you mind taking a look at this PR ^^ ?

We pinned numpy's version in https://github.com/flyteorg/flytekit/pull/1376. I'll invest time today to bring the flytekit conda recipe to match what's in flytekit master.