Folks I have a question for you We are working on revamping

Question

Folks I have a question for you We are working on revamping the flytekit configuration system But always try very hard not to break anyone Would it be ok if we changed flytekit remote constructor and deprecate some configs This may break some scripts that use flytekit remote but the fix will be very simple cc < Maarten de Jong> < jeev> < Dylan Wilder>

Ketan (kumare3) · Answer

the goal is to make it extremely simple for anyone to instantiate flytekit remote and even perform registration directly programmatically We are moving towards a completely automated registration process to improve velocity but we need to change a few things before that

Ketan (kumare3) · Answer

also < Adrian Rumpold>

Ketan (kumare3) · Answer

also < Fabio Grätz> < Emirhan Karagül>

Maarten de Jong · Answer

personally we don t shy away from breaking a few things here and then if it improves the experience so I d be cool with it If there s a issue on the suggested changes it d be interesting to know as well

Fabio Grätz · Answer

Same here we will at first pin a version before that change and then adapt it On Tuesday in the community sync I will talk about how we accelerated registration programatically using the flyte remote and a hydra core launcher we built for flyte With this you can build all images register and optionally execution with a single cmd

Ketan (kumare3) · Answer

This is amazing

Ketan (kumare3) · Answer

So let s just build on that

jeev · Answer

no issue for us either