I was asked to share it here as well. I don't need...
# contribute
c
I was asked to share it here as well. I don't need the dependency removed, but version constraints should definitely be eased. It's not ideal that a library is locking specific versions and using a rather old version. Any help will be appreciated! I'm kind of stuck now
f
Can we make this optional now - now that we have pydantic support
c
Personally I'm not using this functionality, so if you make optional it would be great for me. That said, you should probably upgrade the version and not pin it.
f
that is true, cc @high-accountant-32689
h
I'm actively looking into this. We have an issue with supporting Enums with newer versions of
dataclasses-json
. Once I have an update I'll post here.
c
@high-accountant-32689 thanks! in the meantime, if possible to release a version with that dependency optional, it would be great. I'm aware that it is technically making the library not backwards compatible... so a little problematic.