bumpy-match-83743
07/27/2024, 2:39 PMancient-wolf-19325
07/27/2024, 2:39 PMLiteralType.JSON
datatype. This datatype is designed to handle JSON objects natively, addressing issues with the current JSON handling via protobuf Struct, particularly with integer representation.
According to GitHub Issue #5318, Flyte is working on supporting a new LiteralType.JSON
in FlyteIDL, which will allow users to use any object that can be serialized to JSON using binary/bytearray as the transport layer. This approach will also support custom JSON serializers and deserializers.
Would you like more detail on how to implement this feature or any potential challenges?
Sources:
- GitHub Issue #5318 👍 0 button 👎 0 button 💡 Hint: Mention @runllm in the thread for followups.bumpy-match-83743
07/27/2024, 2:40 PMancient-wolf-19325
07/27/2024, 2:40 PMLiteralType.JSON
in Java tasks and workflows. However, based on the proposed support for LiteralType.JSON
in FlyteIDL, you can follow a general approach to handle JSON inputs and outputs in your Java tasks.
Here is a conceptual example of how you might define and use a JSON literal type in a Java task:
1. Define the JSON Literal Type: Ensure that your FlyteIDL supports LiteralType.JSON
. This might involve updating your FlyteIDL definitions to include the new JSON type.
2. Implement the Task in Java: Use a JSON library like Jackson or Gson to handle JSON serialization and deserialization in your Java tasks.
3. Register the Task and Workflow: Use Flyte's Java SDK to register your task and workflow, specifying the JSON literal type for inputs and outputs.
Here is a simplified example using Jackson for JSON handling in a Java task:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import flytekit.sdk.tasks.Task;
import flytekit.sdk.tasks.TaskInput;
import flytekit.sdk.tasks.TaskOutput;
import flytekit.sdk.tasks.Workflow;
import flytekit.sdk.tasks.WorkflowInput;
import flytekit.sdk.tasks.WorkflowOutput;
public class JsonTaskExample {
// Define a simple POJO for JSON data
public static class MyJsonData {
public int id;
public String name;
// Getters and setters
}
// Task to process JSON input and produce JSON output
public static class ProcessJsonTask extends Task<MyJsonData, MyJsonData> {
private static final ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
@Override
public TaskOutput<MyJsonData> run(TaskInput<MyJsonData> input) {
MyJsonData inputData = input.get();
// Process the JSON data (example: increment the id)
inputData.id += 1;
return TaskOutput.of(inputData);
}
}
// Workflow to use the JSON task
public static class JsonWorkflow extends Workflow<MyJsonData, MyJsonData> {
private final ProcessJsonTask processJsonTask = new ProcessJsonTask();
@Override
public WorkflowOutput<MyJsonData> run(WorkflowInput<MyJsonData> input) {
MyJsonData inputData = input.get();
MyJsonData outputData = processJsonTask.run(TaskInput.of(inputData)).get();
return WorkflowOutput.of(outputData);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Example JSON input
String jsonInput = "{\"id\": 1, \"name\": \"example\"}";
try {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
MyJsonData inputData = objectMapper.readValue(jsonInput, MyJsonData.class);
// Run the workflow
JsonWorkflow workflow = new JsonWorkflow();
MyJsonData result = workflow.run(WorkflowInput.of(inputData)).get();
// Print the result
ancient-wolf-19325
07/27/2024, 2:41 PMString jsonOutput = objectMapper.writeValueAsString(result);
System.out.println("Output JSON: " + jsonOutput);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
In this example:
- MyJsonData
is a simple POJO representing the JSON data.
- ProcessJsonTask
is a task that processes the JSON input and produces JSON output.
- JsonWorkflow
is a workflow that uses the ProcessJsonTask
.
This example demonstrates how to handle JSON data in Java tasks and workflows using Jackson for JSON serialization and deserialization. You would need to ensure that your FlyteIDL and Flyte setup support the LiteralType.JSON
for this to work seamlessly.
Sources:
- GitHub Issue #5318 👍 0 button 👎 0 button 💡 Hint: Mention @runllm in the thread for followups.