https://flyte.org
Join Slack
Hi all, new here. I didn't see a beginner's channel, so I'll ask what seems like a silly question he...
# flyte-support
c
Hi all, new here. I didn't see a beginner's channel, so I'll ask what seems like a silly question here. I followed the instructions described here. I used Python 3.10 on MacBook Pro with M2 Pro chipset. I'm getting the following error:
Failed with Unknown Exception <class 'TypeError'> Reason: Encountered error while executing workflow 'example.training_workflow':
Error encountered while executing 'training_workflow':
Failed to convert outputs of task 'example.get_data' at position 0:
[Errno 2] Failed to open local file '/var/folders/vs/v9fd0vyx6b735n5_l607sq440000gn/T/flyte-nl8jmq53/raw/2bb31bdcb6e0b0733d1bad9b87a3e886/00000'. Detail: [errno 2] No such file or directory
So I did a little digging. From the exception stacktrace it seems like the error happens when attempting to write the output. While debugging I found that indeed this folder isn't created. The temp folder 
/var/folders/vs/v9fd0vyx6b735n5_l607sq440000gn/T/flyte-nl8jmq53/
does exist, but the 
raw
sub folder isn't. I kept debugging until I noticed several things (in reversed order 🙂). The method 
flytekit.core.data_persistence.FileAccessProvider.get_random_remote_path
- the default remote is expectedly 
LocalFileSystem
. 
self._default_protocol
is 
"file"
but in that method, this following line returns `('file', 'local')`:
Copy code
default_protocol = self._default_remote.protocol
This causes 
get_random_remote_path
to eventually return a path that starts with 
file:///...
. Right after getting the random path, in 
flytekit.types.structured.basic_dfs.PandasToParquetEncodingHandler.encode
these lines happen:
Copy code
if not ctx.file_access.is_remote(uri):
    Path(uri).mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
is_remote
returns 
True
but apparently 
Path.mkdir
when operating on 
file://...
path, does NOTHING. So the necessary folder hierarchy does not exist and the code fails. Potential root causes: 1. 
fsspec
for some reason, returns 
('file', 'local')
instead of 
file
. 2. Another option, that 
Flyte
code in 
flytekit.core.data_persistence.FileAccessProvider.get_random_remote_path
Copy code
if type(default_protocol) == list:
            default_protocol = default_protocol[0]
was supposed to test 
tuple
condition as well - this would have probably solved the issue 3. Another possiblity is my Mac... maybe 
Path
behaves weirdly on Mac
HUH! It seems like that 
Path
understands the 
file://..
uri as a relative path, where 
file:
is a folder! si it essentially created the whole hierarchy under the current working directory!!!
Copy code
~/src/ext/flyte/getting-started
├── __pycache__
│   └── example.cpython-310.pyc
├── example.py
└── file:
    └── var
        └── folders
            └── vs
                └── v9fd0vyx6b735n5_l607sq440000gn
                    └── T
                        └── flyte-acgpkxgo
                            └── raw
                                └── e6a9aed58dcb402830573514c3b21d6a
HUH #2! Seems like 
fsspec
changed the 
LocalFileSystem
implementation just recently add added the 
"local"
essentially converting the 
protocol
to a tuple. See here. Interesting... I can create a PR against 
Flyte
checking if it's a tuple and taking the first argument. WDYT?
🙏 1
t
thank you for the investigation!
yes please, could you please put in a pr?
c
@thankful-minister-83577 turns out the 
fsspec
problematic version was published just 2 days ago
I wonder if it broke other things in Flyte as well
t
yeah it has
at least unit tests
if not actual logic
which it looks like it has
c
that's my concern
the fix can be locking down fsspec version, until someone more versed in Flyte than me can take a look
I only today started playing with it
I just have good debugging skills 🙂
t
yup, trying the same in one of our PRs
c
from what I examined 
flytekit
it seems like it mostly impacts that specific point so testing if the protocol is either a list or a tuple and then taking the first component should work.
From briefly looking at fsspec code, it seems like that was their intention - the protocol is a list of protocols
t
there’s some edge-case handling code for windows
yeah but not always.
i know s3 is like that though. we’ll be more careful with logic around that
c
should I go ahead and try fixing it, or you want to take it?
tensureflow tests are being run when running 
make test
but nothing installs tensorflow. Am I missing something? I'm ran 
make setup
and then 
make test
ah! it doesn't install tensoreflow when running on arm (M2). Got it.
t
if you want to by all means!
but if not we’ll take it
c
I got it seems like that in most cases (cloud storage classes) you already treat the protocol as a list just the local case seems to be neglected. I'll try to do something
🙏 1
gratitude thank you 2
f
I missed it, cc @thankful-minister-83577 does the Flyte:// pr affect this
c
@freezing-airport-6809 the new version is failing many unit tests. If your PR passes with the latest 
fsspec
I believe you are good to go.
When are you planning to merge and release the next version? (I think you implicitly fixed it)
f
ohh nice
i merged it, there is a new beta already released if you want to try it
1.10.0.b1
s
hi @freezing-airport-6809 where should i download the beta version? i have similar problem
c
@strong-furniture-18784 
pip install flytekit==1.10.1b0
s
ohh b0, okay thank you
c
Since it's a beta version, you need to specify the version explicitly. Once a non-beta version is released you can simply run 
pip install --upgrade flytekit
to get the latest version
👍 1
s
thank you @curved-petabyte-84246
f
You can also use —pre
👍 2
c
@freezing-airport-6809 apparently someone (maybe @thankful-minister-83577) already pinned 
fsspec
version so you might not have fixed the issue. I will rebase on top of your changes and double check
"fsspec>=2023.3.0,<=2023.9.2"
t
yeah i didn’t fix it, i just pinned it.
it was pinned in that the large pr that went in recently
👍 1
c
seems like it's working with recent changes (they don't rely directly on the file system protocol)
tests pass locally with 
fsspec==2023.10.0
t
oh that’s good to know
but still want to be a bit careful when unpinning
c
although that's weird...
t
what’s weird
c
let's me gather some information and I'll add more details
g
Just had this today (first time trying flyte) and 
fsspec>=2023.3.0,<=2023.9.2
fixes it for now without having to get a beta version of flytekit
c
@green-agency-30976 yeah, we are aware (the beta version contains this fix as well)
@thankful-minister-83577 seems like there's a commented-out test -
Copy code
# def test_transformer_to_literal_localss():
#     random_dir = context_manager.FlyteContext.current_context().file_access.get_random_local_directory()
#     fs = FileAccessProvider(local_sandbox_dir=random_dir, raw_output_prefix=os.path.join(random_dir, "raw"))
#     ctx = context_manager.FlyteContext.current_context()
#     with context_manager.FlyteContextManager.with_context(ctx.with_file_access(fs)) as ctx:
#
#         tf = FlyteDirToMultipartBlobTransformer()
#         lt = tf.get_literal_type(FlyteDirectory)
#         # Can't use if it's not a directory
#         with pytest.raises(FlyteAssertion):
#             p = "/tmp/flyte/xyz"
#             path = pathlib.Path(p)
#             try:
#                 path.unlink()
#             except OSError:
#                 ...
#             with open(p, "w") as fh:
#                 fh.write("hello world\n")
#             tf.to_literal(ctx, FlyteDirectory(p), FlyteDirectory, lt)
This test was failing before. There's another test with a similar name (without the typo)
@freezing-airport-6809 ☝️ why did you comment it out?
f
uhho - i took over the PR from @thankful-minister-83577, let me take a look
256 Views
Open in Slack
PreviousNext
Powered by

Flyte

Flyte enables production-grade orchestration for machine learning workflows and data processing created to accelerate local workflows to production.

Powered by