#1930 [Core feature] Support S3FS like mountable file systems and S3 interchangably Issue created by kumare3 Motivation: Why do you think this is important? It is possible to mount S3 using S3FS. This would make it possible for users to simply write file system ops to read and write raw data and Flyte to read and write input / output metadata. Today this can be achieved using flytekitplugins-k8s (raw pods). Another method could be to allow platform maintainers to switch on support for a mountable file-system. In such a case Flyteplugins (pods) can simply translate the s3://... uris to local filesystem equivalents. This would also make it possible to easily interoperate between systems that do not support mountable file systems. ☐ Document how to use S3FS etc using pods ☐ Modify Flyteplugins to support this and document the protocol with a usecase sample Goal: What should the final outcome look like, ideally? ☐ Users should have document to understand how these file systems can be mounted. ☐ Users with existing workflows should be able to transparently use S3FS without changing code Describe alternatives you've considered NA Propose: Link/Inline OR Additional context No response Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already? ☑︎ Yes Have you read the Code of Conduct? ☑︎ Yes flyteorg/flyte