What is the preferred way to deploy these days? We have been happily using Flyte for a year now but the setup has changed significantly compared to back then and updating to 1.6 is not straightforward. Should we consider the manifests from the recent release as the most authoritative or instead the helm-chart approach from this guide which btw seems to be installing an entirely new application

flyte-binary

that seems to bundle ... well everything? Do you recommend using flyte-binary these days unless one is using a multi-cluster setup?

if you’ve already been using flyte with separate deployments for admin, propeller, datacatalog and console, the flyte-core chart might be a better fit for you. flyte-binary was a way help new users onboard faster basically.

Thanks for the direction!

@Tim Bauer do you have a link for the above?

Difficult to link the chart but if you run

helm template flyte-backend flyteorg/flyte-core --namespace flyte | grep apiextensions

You will see that its using the old v1beta1 api.

We should be able to just dynamically derive api versions based on the cluster version

Ah maybe I'm just too bad at using helm - our approach is basically to not use it but render manifests from it using

template

and than overlaying our kustomizations.

Ah its much smarter than I knew.

there should be a CLI arg to provide the api versions

Awesome, thank you!